NIH Consensus Statement: Health Implications of Obesity
by the National Institutes of Health
Edited and presented by Blake Linton Wilfong -- The Wondersmith!

49. Health Implications of Obesity
National Institutes of Health
Consensus Development Conference Statement
February 11-13, 1985


Current knowledge of human obesity has progressed beyond the simple generalizations of the past. Formerly, obesity was considered fully explained by the single adverse behavior of inappropriate eating in the setting of attractive foods. The study of animal models of obesity, biochemical alterations in man and experimental animals, and the complex interactions of psychosocial and cultural factors that create susceptibility to human obesity indicate that this disease in man is complex and deeply rooted in biologic systems. Thus, it is almost certain that obesity has multiple causes and that there are different types of obesity.

To assess the health implications of obesity, new knowledge and new epidemiologic observations have introduced a variety of complications that must be addressed. Thus, a reassessment of definitions and measurements of obesity is required. There is controversy surrounding the interpretation of data showing an association of body weight with morbidity and mortality. The interpretations of data from different studies have been complicated by the confounding effects of smoking behavior, the coexistence of diseases other than obesity, and variations in methods of data collection and followup. Because population samples in some studies have not been representative of the U.S. population, there have been uncertainties as to how far their conclusions can be generalized for recommendations for dietary advice and treatment.

There is evidence that an increasing number of children and adolescents are overweight. Even though all overweight children will not necessarily become overweight adults, the increasing prevalence of obesity in childhood is likely to be reflected in increasing obesity in adult years. The high prevalence of obesity in our adult population and the likelihood that the nation of the future will be even more obese demand a reassessment of the health implications of this condition.

For the special purpose of resolving the pressing questions relating to the health implications of obesity, the NIH Office of Medical Applications of Research, the National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a consensus development conference on the health implications of obesity on February 11-13, 1985. After listening to 1 days of presentations by experts in the field, hearing audience comments, and reviewing the medical literature, a consensus panel representing the professional fields of nutrition, nutritional biochemistry and metabolism, endocrinology, internal medicine, gastroenterology, epidemiology, biostatistics, psychiatry, pediatrics, and family medicine considered the evidence and agreed on answers to the following questions:

Only the above questions were addressed. Extremely important issues relating to obesity such as prevention, treatment (including exercise), and the impact on society were not addressed by this panel. The special relationship of obesity to lower socioeconomic status was not addressed.

What Is Obesity?

Adipose tissue is a normal constituent of the human body that serves the important function of storing energy as fat for mobilization in response to metabolic demands. Obesity is an excess of body fat frequently resulting in a significant impairment of health. The excess fat accumulation is associated with increased fat cell size; in individuals with extreme obesity, fat cell numbers are also increased. Although the etiologic mechanisms underlying obesity require further clarification, the net effect of such mechanisms leads to an imbalance between energy intake and expenditure. Both genetic and environmental factors are likely to be involved in the pathogenesis of obesity. These include excess caloric intake, decreased physical activity, and metabolic and endocrine abnormalities. Hence, a number of subtypes of obesity exist.

The precise determination of the amount of body fat requires technically sophisticated methods that are available only in research laboratories. For public health studies and clinical practice, simple and convenient anthropometric measurements based on height, weight, and skinfold thickness are recommended. For adults of 20 years and older, two methods are now in wide use: (1) estimation of relative weight (RW = measured body weight divided by midpoint of medium frame desirable weight recommended in the 1959 or 1983 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company tables) and (2) calculation of body mass index (BMI = [body weight in kg] divided by [height in m]2). Because body composition varies among individuals of the same height and weight, these measurements only approximate the precise magnitude of fatness. Nevertheless, they correlate with the risk of adverse effects on health and longevity. Separate criteria must be used for evaluating fatness in children and adolescents.

Adipose tissue depots do not constitute a uniform organ; fat cells around the waist and flank and in the abdomen are more active metabolically than those in the thigh and buttocks. The location of body fat has emerged as an important predictor of the health hazards of obesity. Sites of body fat predominance are easily measured by the ratio of waist to hip circumferences. High ratios are associated with higher risks for death and illness.

Based on indices of body fat, studies of large populations have shown that there is a continuous relationship between RW or BMI and morbidity and mortality. Thus, it becomes important to establish ranges of these indices as guidelines for developing appropriate and effective approaches for the treatment and prevention of obesity.

Since the amount of body fat, as estimated by the above indices, is a continuous variable within the population, all quantitative definitions of obesity must be arbitrary. The panelists agree that an increase in body weight of 20 percent or more above desirable body weight constitutes an established health hazard. Significant health risks at lower levels of obesity can present hazards, especially in the presence of diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, or their associated risk factors.

What Is the Evidence That Obesity Has Adverse Effects on Health?

Clinical observations have long suggested a connection of obesity (particularly in its extreme forms) with a variety of illnesses. Obesity creates an enormous psychological burden. In fact, in terms of suffering, this burden may be the greatest adverse effect of obesity. At the present time, the strongest evidence that obesity has an adverse effect on physical health comes from population-based prevalence (cross-sectional) and cohort (followup) studies. These data are complemented by weight-reduction trials.

The most comprehensive data on prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and obesity are the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). NHANES I was conducted from 1971 through 1974 and NHANES II from 1976 through 1980. Both were based on a representative sample of residents of the United States.

Data from NHANES II were analyzed by comparing several parameters for the subjects at or above, or below, the 85th percentile of the reference population.* At or above this cutoff point, males have a BMI greater than or equal to 27.8 and females have a BMI greater than or equal to 27.3. This analysis showed a strong association between the prevalence of obesity and CVD risk factors. Based on these criteria, the prevalence of hypertension (blood pressure greater than 160/95) is 2.9 times higher for the overweight than for the nonoverweight. The prevalence is 5.6 times higher for the young (20 through 44 years old) overweight than for the nonoverweight subjects in this age group. The prevalence is twice as high for the obese older (45 through 74 years old) group as it is for the nonoverweight subjects of the same age. The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (blood cholesterol over 250 mg/dl) in the young overweight age group is 2.1 times that of the nonoverweight group; overweight and nonoverweight subjects show similar prevalences for hypercholesterolemia after age 45.

* Noninstitutionalized, nonpregnant U.S. residents, ages 20 to 29, 1976-1980.

Levels of blood pressure and serum cholesterol vary with levels of obesity in a continuous manner. This relationship holds for the so-called normal as well as the elevated range in observational studies. Intervention studies confirm that levels of blood pressure and serum cholesterol can be reduced by weight reduction.

The prevalence of reported diabetes is 2.9 times higher in overweight than nonoverweight persons in the NHANES data. Type II diabetes (maturity onset or noninsulin-dependent mellitus--NIDDM) appears to be an inherited disease; however, studies clearly show that weight reduction can reverse the abnormal biochemical characteristics of NIDDM.

Coronary Artery Heart Disease (CAHD)

The relationship of obesity to the incidence of CAHD has been studied in a large number of cohort studies. In contrast to the consistent relationship of obesity to CAHD risk factors found in the overwhelming majority of prevalence studies, widely divergent results have been reported for the relationship of obesity to the incidence of CAHD. Thus, the eight cohort studies of the U.S. Pooling Project found discrepant results, including no association, a U-shaped relationship, and a positive relationship of obesity to CAHD. However, when data from these same studies were combined, there was a positive relationship of obesity to the risk of CAHD. Possible explanations for the discrepant findings include differences in health status of industrial workers in contrast with health status of the total population, varying duration of followup among the studies, and inadequate sample sizes.

Studies in which obesity predicted CAHD usually found that obesity was not a risk factor independent of the standard risk factors. However, the Framingham Study, a large general population-based study that is strengthened by having long duration followup data, recently disclosed an increasing risk of CAHD with increasing levels of obesity, independent of the other standard risk factors.

Other recent studies indicate that the distribution of fat deposits may be a better predictor of CAHD than is the degree of obesity. Excess abdominal fat is more often related to disease than are fat deposits in the thigh or gluteal areas.


There are numerous epidemiological studies of obesity and site-specific malignancies, one of the largest of which is the American Cancer Society (ACS) Study involving more than 1 million men and women. Through the last followup year (1972), 93 percent of the subjects were traced (alive or dead). Obese males, regardless of smoking habits, had a higher mortality from cancer of the colon, rectum, and prostate. Obese females had a higher mortality from cancer of the gallbladder, biliary passages, breast (postmenopausal), uterus (including both cervix and endometrium), and ovaries. In the case of endometrial cancer, women with marked obesity showed the highest relative risk (5.4) for the obese versus the nonobese.

What Is the Evidence That Obesity Affects Longevity?

Obesity, when measured by relative weight (actual weight as a percentage of average or desirable weight for a given height/age/sex group) has an adverse effect on longevity. Convincing evidence of this has been evaluated in four very large insurance studies (1903 to 1979), the Framingham 30-Year Followup Study, the American Cancer Society Study, and other smaller cohort studies. Some additional cohort studies do not show this adverse effect, but these studies present problems in interpretation due to small size, followup 10 years or less, occupational bias, or a population otherwise not representative of the U.S. population. The greater the degree of overweight, the higher the mortality ratio or excess death rate. Both mortality ratio and excess deaths per 1,000 per year increase with length of followup. Two small groups of insurance policyholders who reduced weight to acceptable levels for standard insurance had a decline in mortality to normal. In the insurance studies, the increased mortality with overweight was observed in normotensive men and women, without other major impairment, who would have been eligible for standard insurance rates except for being overweight. Smokers were not differentiated from nonsmokers. In the Framingham and ACS studies, the increase in excess mortality with increasing degrees of overweight was present in both smokers and nonsmokers.

The pattern of excess mortality variation with relative weight is illustrated in men ages 15 to 39 years at entry from data in the 1979 Build Study:

Relative to
Average Weight
65-75% 105%
75-95 93
105-115 110
115-125 127
125-135 134
135-145 141
145-155 211
155-165 227

For those with relative weight of 125 to 135 percent at entry, the aggregate mortality ratio was 134 percent, as shown above. When mortality was analyzed by duration, the mortality ratio increased from 110 percent at the 0 to 5-year interval to 169 percent at the 15 to 22-year interval. The weight class for lowest mortality shown above is below the average weight category. There is higher mortality in the lowest relative weight class, 65 to 75 percent of average. In extreme obesity ("morbid" obesity), the mortality ratio has been reported in a small series as being of the order of 1,200 percent. A recent analysis has shown that the body mass index of minimum mortality, derived from the data in the 1979 Build Study, increases with age in a straight line relationship, the lines for male and female being virtually identical. The 1959 and 1983 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company tables of ranges of weight with minimal mortality do not provide for any age variation.

The increase in mortality versus relative weight is steeper in men and women under age 50 than in older persons, and the increase with duration is also steeper. These findings suggest that particular attention should be paid to efforts to reduce weight in younger patients.

Recent studies suggest that the distribution of fat deposits may be a better predictor of mortality than BMI or RW. If confirmed, it may be important in the future to measure fat distribution in addition to using height-weight tables.

What Are the Appropriate Uses and Limitations of Existing Height-Weight Tables?

There is consensus that a measure of obesity is needed to overcome the subjectivity introduced by simply relying on visual inspection as an estimate of obesity. Equipment for measuring height and weight, height-weight tables, and weight-related indices are widely available.

Various indices for adults are available. These can be categorized into three groups:

Extensive height-weight data (e.g., National Center for Health Statistics) are available for estimating obesity in infants and children.

Tables of Average Weights by Height and Age

These tables report cross-sectional data on a representative sample of the noninstitutionalized population living in the United States. They represent averages rather than optimal data and may be useful for descriptive purposes.

Tables of Desirable Weights by Height

These tables are based on weights associated with the lowest mortality rate among insured populations of adults. At least two versions are in current use: the 1959 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company table and the 1983 revision.

Confusion exists as a result of the slight increases in desirable weights seen in the 1983 as opposed to the 1959 tables. In the 1983 tables, desirable weights for men and women in the shortest stature groups are 12 and 14 pounds higher respectively than they were in 1959. It is recognized that such increased body weight may contribute to high blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, and glucose intolerance or similar risk factors, apart from the impact of weight on mortality. Neither the 1959 nor the 1983 height-weight tables reflect current weight and mortality relationship for the American population, since, of necessity, the deaths reflect the mortality experiences of policyholders with a cutoff date of 11 years prior to the publication of the tables.



Body Mass Index

The body mass index

BMI = Body wt in Kg/(Ht in m)2

is a simple measurement highly correlated with other estimates of fatness. It minimizes the effect of height and is useful for descriptive or evaluative purposes. It has the advantage of permitting comparison of populations. The major limitation of the BMI is that it is difficult to interpret this mathematical index to patients and to relate it to weight that must be lost.

The consensus panel recommends that physicians adopt this measure as an additional factor in evaluating patients and that nomograms be used to facilitate calculations of BMI.

For What Medical Conditions Can Weight Reduction Be Recommended?

Weight reduction may be lifesaving for patients with extreme obesity, arbitrarily defined as weight twice the desirable weight or 45 kg (100 pounds) over desirable weight. When obesity is accompanied by severe cardiopulmonary manifestations, as in the Pickwickian syndrome, weight reduction should be part of the treatment for this medical emergency.

In view of the excess mortality and morbidity associated with obesity (as discussed above), weight reduction should be recommended to persons with excess body weight of 20 percent or more above desirable weights in the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company tables (using the midpoint of the range for a medium-build person). In the 1983 tables, 20 percent over desirable weight is a higher weight than would be obtained by the use of the 1959 tables. The maximum increase is found in those of short stature and does not exceed 17 percent for men or 13 percent for women. Although not a specific recommendation of the panel, use of the lower weights as goals would be advisable in the presence of any of the complications or risk factors summarized below. The body mass index values, which correspond to 20 percent above desirable weight, are 27.2 and 26.9 for men and women, respectively, using the 1983 tables and 26.4 and 25.8 for men and women, respectively, using the 1959 tables. These values are not substantially different from the BMI values for men and women identified with the lower cutoff point for overweight as determined by the National Center for Health Statistics--27.8 and 27.3 for men and women, respectively (NHANES II population, bare feet, no clothes).

Weight reduction is also highly desirable, even in patients with lesser degrees of obesity, in many other circumstances, including the following:

Weight reduction is likely to be helpful, although the benefits may not be as clear as in the circumstances listed above, in other circumstances, including:

In any circumstance in which excessive weight imposes functional burdens, weight reduction may improve functioning of the affected system, organ, or region. Such conditions include many common disorders, for example:

Weight reduction in the treatment of these conditions should be under the direction of a physician because accurate diagnosis is needed before treatment is started, and weight reduction may have to be accompanied by other treatments. In addition to physicians, the assistance of other health professionals is critical for treatment in any weight-reduction program. When exercise is prescribed as an adjunct to other methods of weight-reduction, assessment by a physician of the cardiopulmonary risk of exercise is especially important.

The panel views with concern the increasing frequency of obesity in children and adolescents. Obese children should be encouraged to bring their weight to within normal limits. Although childhood obesity does not necessarily lead to obesity in adulthood, there is evidence that it is a significant risk factor for adult obesity. Because dietary restriction can adversely affect parent-child relationships, eating behavior, and growth and maturation, physicians must carefully monitor any dietary restrictions.

What Should Be the Directions of Future Research in This Area?

It is vitally important to increase the understanding of obesity to enable prevention. Because obesity is so prevalent, any effective strategy for prevention will have public health importance. The following areas of investigation, dealing mainly with the questions addressed to this panel, are stressed:

Great advances of modern biological science as applied to obesity can generate new information that can now be tested at the bedside. Clinical investigation utilizing the biological advances is timely. The best of public health sciences, including the anthropological and sociological, should be brought into the study of the prevention of obesity.


The evidence is now overwhelming that obesity, defined as excessive storage of energy in the form of fat, has adverse effects on health and longevity. Obesity is clearly associated with hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, NIDDM, and excess of certain cancers and other medical problems. Height and weight tables based on mortality data or the body mass index are helpful measures to determine the presence of obesity and the need for treatment. Thirty-four million adult Americans have a body mass index greater than 27.8 (men) or 27.3 (women). At this level of obesity, which is very close to a weight increase of 20 percent above desirable, treatment is strongly advised. When diabetes, hypertension, or a family history for these diseases is present, treatment will lead to benefits even when lesser degrees of obesity are present.

Obesity research efforts should be directed toward elucidation of biologic markers, factors regulating the regional distribution of fat, studies of energy regulation, and studies utilizing the techniques of anthropology, psychiatry, and the social sciences.

Consensus Development Panel

Jules Hirsch, M.D.
Panel Chairman
Professor, Rockefeller University
New York, New York
Cherryl H. Bell, M.S., R.D.
Corporate Nutritionist
Safeway Stores, Inc.
Oakland, California
Johanna T. Dwyer, D.Sc., R.D.
Professor of Medicine (Nutrition) and Community Health
Tufts Medical School
Director, Frances Stern Nutrition Center
New England Medical Center Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts
David R. Hawkins, M.D.
Professor of Psychiatry
Pritzker School of Medicine
University of Chicago
Director, Consultation-Liaison Service
Department of Psychiatry
Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
Edward J. Huth, M.D.
Editor, Annals of Internal Medicine
American College of Physicians
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Herbert L. Hyman, M.D., F.A.C.P.
Senior Consultant in Gastroenterology
Lehigh Valley Hospital Center and Allentown Hospital
Allentown, Pennsylvania
Ahmed H. Kissebah, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology
Director, Clinical Research Center
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Kristen W. McNutt, Ph.D., J.D.
Associate Director
Good Housekeeping Institute
New York, New York
Maria I. New, M.D.
Professor and Chairman
Department of Pediatrics
New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York
Ethan A. H. Sims, M.D.
Professor Emeritus of Medicine
Endocrine and Metabolic Unit
Department of Medicine
University of Vermont College of Medicine
Burlington, Vermont
Richard B. Singer, M.D.
Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors
York, Maine
William E. Straw, M.D.
Family Physician
Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Palo Alto, California
Herman A. Tyroler, M.D.
Professor of Epidemiology
Department of Epidemiology
University of North Carolina
School of Public Health
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Vernon R. Young, Ph.D.
Professor of Nutritional Biochemistry
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts


Reubin Andres, M.D.
"Impact of Age on Weight Goals"
Clinical Director
National Institute on Aging
Gerontology Research Center
Francis Scott Key Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland
Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, M.D., D.C.M.T.
"Obesity, Atherogenesis, and Coronary Heart Disease"
Professor and Chair
Department of Community and Family Medicine
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California
Per Björntorp, M.D., Ph.D.
"Regional Patterns of Fat Distribution: Health Implications"
Professor of Medicine
University of Göteborg
Sahlgren's Hospital
George A. Bray, M.D.
"Complications of Obesity: Digestive Diseases, Pulmonary Problems, Endocrine Entities, Orthopedic and Dermal Difficulties, and Miscellaneous Mishaps"
Professor of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics
Chief, Division of Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition
University of Southern California Medical Center
Los Angeles, California
John D. Brunzell, M.D.
"Obesity, Hyperlipidemia, and Diabetes"
Professor of Medicine
Division of Metabolism
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington
Harriet P. Dustan, M.D.
"Obesity and Hypertension"
Professor of Medicine and Director,
Cardiovascular Research and Training Center
University of Alabama, Birmingham
University Station
Birmingham, Alabama
Manning Feinleib, M.D., Dr.P.H.
"Epidemiology of Obesity in Relation to Health Hazards"
National Center for Health Statistics
Hyattsville, Maryland
Lawrence Garfinkel
"Overweight and Cancer"
Vice President, Epidemiology and Statistics
Director, Cancer Prevention
American Cancer Society
New York, New York
Robert J. Garrison
"Framingham Heart Study: An Assessment of the Relationship Between Relative Weight and 30-Year Mortality in Framingham Men"
Chief, Field Studies Branch
Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland
M. R. C. Greenwood, Ph.D
"Adipose Tissue: Cellular Morphology and Development"
Professor, Department of Biology
Vassar College
Poughkeepsie, New York
Gail G. Harrison, Ph.D
"What's Wrong and What's Right With Height-Weight Tables"
Associate Professor, Department of Family and
Community Medicine
University of Arizona
College of Medicine
Tucson, Arizona
Francis E. Johnston, Ph.D
"Health Implications of Childhood Obesity"
Professor and Chairman
Department of Anthropology
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Reinhold Kluthe, M.D.
"Health Implications of Obesity: A European Perspective"
Head, Section of Nutritional Medicine and Dietetics
Chief, Nutritional Laboratories and Dietetic Services
Medical University Hospital
John G. Kral, M.D., Ph.D.
"Morbid Obesity and Related Health Risks"
Associate Professor of Surgery
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
New York, New York
Rudolph L. Leibel, M.D.
"Characterization of Obesity: Morphometric and Metabolic Considerations"
Rockefeller University
New York, New York
Edward A. Lew
"Mortality According to Variations in Weight: Insured Lives and American Cancer Society Studies"
Actuarial Consultant
Society of Actuaries
Project Director
Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors
Punta Gorda, Florida
Reuel A. Stallones, M.D., M.P.H.
"Epidemiological Studies of Obesity: Strengths and Pitfalls"
Dean and Professor of Epidemiology
University of Texas School of Public Health
Houston, Texas
Albert J. Stunkard, M.D. (and Thomas A. Wadden, PL.D.)
"The Adverse Psychological Consequences of Obesity"
Professor of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Theodore B. Van Itallie, M.D.
"Health Implications of Overweight and Obesity: An American Perspective"
Professor of Medicine
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
New York, New York

Planning Committee

Benjamin T. Burton, Ph.D. (Cochairman)
Associate Director for Disease Prevention and Technology Transfer
National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland
Theodore B. Van Itallie, M.D. (Co-chairman)
Professor of Medicine
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
New York, New York
Reubin Andres, M.D.
Clinical Director
National Institute on Aging
Gerontology Research Center
Francis Scott Key Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland
Michael J. Bernstein
Director of Communications
Office of Medical Applications of Research
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland
C. Wayne Callaway, M.D.
Nutrition and Lipid Clinic
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota
Susan M. Clark
Coordinator, NIH Office of Medical
Applications of Research
Social Science Analyst
Office of Medical Applications of Research
Office of the Director
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland
Nancy Ernst, M.S., R.D.
Nutrition Coordinator for the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Office of the Director
Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland
Willis R. Foster, M.D.
Senior Staff Physician
Office of Disease Prevention and Technology Transfer
National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland
William H. Hall
Technical Publications Writer
National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland
Jules Hirsch, M.D.
Rockefeller University
New York, New York
Merrill S. Read, Ph.D.
Chief, Clinical Nutrition and Early Development Branch
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland
Frederic Seltzer, F.S.A.
Assistant Actuary
Pensions Planning
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
New York, New York

Conference Sponsors

Office of Medical Applications of Research
Itzhak Jacoby, Ph.D.
Acting Director
National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Mortimer Lipsett, M.D.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Claude Lenfant, M.D.

This statement was originally published as:

Health Implications of Obesity. NIH Consens Statement 1985 Feb 11-13; 5(9):1-7.

NIH Consensus Statements are prepared by a nonadvocate, non-Federal panel of experts, based on (1) presentations by investigators working in areas relevant to the consensus questions during a 2-day public session; (2) questions and statements from conference attendees during open discussion periods that are part of the public session; and (3) closed deliberations by the panel during the remainder of the second day and morning of the third. This statement is an independent report of the consensus panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.

to Curvy and Voluptuous
to Sexy Slender Women main page
to The World of the Wondersmith

Sexy Slender Women
Copyright © 2001-2018 Blake Linton Wilfong
All rights reserved.